注册 登录  
 加关注
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

Bioinformatics home

 
 
 

日志

 
 

GRE 8.1  

2008-08-01 16:12:00|  分类: GRE |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
Would you like to work with the person who owns similar opinion with you or the person who hold opposite view? In my opinion, I would like to accept both of them regardless of their altitude that including positive and negative aspects from you and is reasonable in my place.
Admittedly, as common people, we always decline to accept positively view in society since it contains our personal appetite and reflect similar opinion of word value. In this way, we can easily communicate with other people and have a good and high efficiency in solving the corresponding problem spontaneity. Furthermore, we don't worry about any repugnance that might be brought about in communication with person or group with positive view and cause some awkward problem in understanding each other. Microsoft brilliance success tells us that it is vital to organism a mighty team with most common goal and dream. If there is no common goal and dream, we are hard to think that Microsoft would be one of the most outstanding companies in software realm.
However, there is also some negative or even lethal impact from positive opinion. As an old saying goes that every coin has two sides. In same interest, idea or thinking, it is very difficult for us to find fallacy existed in our work, study, or ordinary life, since we can always find others' flaw other than our.
Without various tone, we may be in the perfect situation in which we feel us no any problem. Actually, we should resort to negative feedback to make clear of our mistake and improve ourselves. Then we can get certain promotion and obtain more compelling quality. Aristotle put forward earth-center thesis which was proven to be fallacious by coming scientist. As we all know, Aristotle is outstanding person in that time and also was authorities. However, he can't find the truth--sun-centre as there was no objecting opinion. Similarly, if no negative opinion from Cornpones, human being might access the real thesis in a later time.
Further, it is no denied fact that overdose negative feedback sometime can cause pressure on us which enable us unconfident and give defeat to our mental. Certainly, it is bad for us mental situation and cause negative impact for our success and solving problem. So, we should learn to study how to deal with negative feedback and have a good mind in front of it. Then we can learn much from negative feedback and conquer its bad impact.
In sum, we never neglect either positive view or negative opinion. If there is reasonable element in positive view or negative opinion, we should learn to assimilate the advantage of them and promote our progress and success. Furthermore, keeping a good mind is vital to deal with them.




By paying the company's employees for each brush they produce instead of for the time they spend producing brushes, the argument conclude that the best workers will be kept in company and there will be more profitable coming year for the company. To support the opinion, the argument analyzes that the policy will lead to more production of more and better brushes, and also enables the company factories to operate for fewer hours-resulting in saving on electricity and security costs. In my view, however, the argument lends little credible support to the result.
To begin with, the argument unfairly assumes that the best workers will stay in the company after the executing of the policy. Common sense tells us there are various work types in producing brush with different characters. It is unreasonable to act the same salary measuring method. Perhaps there is work that is only essential to be measured by time other than quantity and have more high produce efficiency.
Similarly, the report doesn't tell us how to exactly enact the policy and hasty conclude that the company will earn a profit in the coming year. It is entirely possible quantity of brush produced under the policy would be less than quantity produced under precious policy as the coming standard's labor strength is less than before. Furthermore, if the coming policy's standard is so hard and worker can't put up with it. It will lead to workers' repugnance and cause negative impact on production, and worker may turn to jump to another company. Without considering and ruling out these possibilities, it is hard to convince me to accept the assuming that the company will own the best workers and earn a profit in the coming year.
Furthermore, the argument unjustifiable assumes that electricity and security costs will be saved by execute the coming policy. It is highly possible that workers will utilize more electricity and other energy in company to achieve more production regardless of wasting. The argument also does not have quality requirement in the policy. Perhaps, in order to chase maximum quantity, worker will neglect brush quality and produce much worse brush which is unfavorable for earning profit.
In sum, there will be much neglect influence might result from the executing of new policy. Without accounting for neglect possibility like mentioned above, the new policy is highly suspicious to favor of attracting more the best workers and earning more profit for company. Before executing of every new salary policy, the company leader should do more detail survey, listen to various opinions, then analysis the possible coming neglect impact and make some essential measure to avoid these impacts in advance. Otherwise it might lead to the opposite result.
  评论这张
 
阅读(483)| 评论(0)
推荐 转载

历史上的今天

在LOFTER的更多文章

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2017